operator
operator copied to clipboard
Simple Kubernetes Operator for MinIO clusters :computer:
In a recent release, tenant seems to not accept an existing secret for the MinIO root credentials. ## Expected Behavior I provide Helm the following values file: ``` tenant: configSecret:...
When update failed, tenant will reset to the default one without any information ``` minio-operator-bdb6b4f55-bkdg7 operator E0909 07:20:34.734171 1 main-controller.go:1570] error syncing '/': resource name may not be empty minio-operator-bdb6b4f55-bkdg7...
## When using an external certificate, the tenant loses its own internal certificate (making it unusable) You also have to use MINIO_SERVER_URL, although the documentation states that it is no...
**Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.** I had a lot of problems finding out a working solution for my minio deployment beside a kube-promethueus-stack one. I...
## Expected Behavior The operator should be able to talk to its tenants using the secret provides in the `spec.users` array of a tenant. ## Current Behavior The operator logs...
When the operator syncs the tenant, it copies the labels and annotations from the Tenant to the StatefulSet, causing undesirable side effects. ## Expected Behavior Similar to how the Service...
The - in principle correct - log message suffers from incorrect argument replacement. ## Expected Behavior The error log message is (correctly & expectedly) produced when the MinIO server processes...
**Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.** When deploying the minio-operator on an OpenShift cluster in a newly created namespace (ex. minio-operator) an SCC error is commonly...
This PR implements the following changes: - Not needed to set configuration secret on the command-line anymore (is read from the tenant configuration) - Allow environment variables to be read...
Update the MinioJob environment variables to match the `Tenant` specification. _Originally posted by @pjuarezd in https://github.com/minio/operator/pull/2295#discussion_r1737369115_