Michael Solomon

@kevinresol / @back2dos , please close the issue if fixed

@nadako Does this issue still relevant?

Why not use tools like `yeoman` or `plopjs`?

Yes. Must say that it sounds like a package by itself, and we may want separate it to another repo

Created an organization in Snyk and added this repo: https://app.snyk.io/org/practica.js/projects @goldbergyoni Invited you to the organization. Also, I sent a access request for snyk to `Practica` org

@lirantal added SAST, I'm just not sure I added it correctly: https://github.com/practicajs/practica/pull/151/files#diff-6102d4f2cddb56c446459bde9bf8e8044b87ce3f98a24c2bba99debfd62461dcR21 In the build, I don't see an indication for SCA, only for SAST (`Test type: Static code analysis`):...

@lirantal added `--all-project` option. I'm trying to produce a sarif file for both SAST and SCA but I get this error, is this a bug?  https://github.com/practicajs/practica/runs/7483982273?check_suite_focus=true

@lirantal why I can't find `code test` command in [the docs](https://docs.snyk.io/snyk-cli/cli-reference#snyk-code)?

@goldbergyoni I fixed the Snyk part :) why does the coverage fail? :( @lirantal I disabled this one because I already added this check in the `github actions`. p.s: Now...

> @mikicho I could not understand why codecov is angry. Since we know that there is no code logic here or coverage drop, let's ignore this status fail. Do you...