Mike Harder

Results 54 comments of Mike Harder

> > @aarongalang > > > > Aaron Galang > > FTE: Pipeline "specs - typespec - pr" is working for your PR now. It looks like you need to...

> @mikeharder Mike Harder FTE how does npx tsv work? I've tried using it to format my changes, but while it did cause specs - typespec - pr check to...

@konrad-jamrozik: @aarongalang claims he does not have permissions to remove the `ARMChangesRequested` label, as instructed by this comment: https://github.com/Azure/azure-rest-api-specs/pull/24749#issuecomment-1650513357 Is there something he should do to get the necessary permissions...

> I've removed it for @aarongalang @croomes: Are PR authors supposed to be able to remove the label themselves?

/azp run TypeSpec Validation

The `tsp format` bug is fixed in `@typespec/[email protected]`, which was just updated in `main` and merged to this branch. New CI run: https://dev.azure.com/azure-sdk/public/_build/results?buildId=2851117&view=logs&j=9cd39ef8-47c1-5b58-08db-8c3708712f1b&t=b0666886-a1bc-5f0b-4c5c-3e4f20acee0f @minkefusiji: Can you please fix the documentation-required...

@minkefusiji: Are you still planning to merge this PR at some point? If so, we can help you get the spec passing all checks and merged into main. If not,...

This is almost passing CI, just one more swagger with changed property order: https://dev.azure.com/azure-sdk/public/_build/results?buildId=2818152&view=logs&j=9cd39ef8-47c1-5b58-08db-8c3708712f1b&t=8131bd26-22cb-54aa-fbbc-112785f95f08

@markcowl: Are any of these changes compatible with both 44 and 45? If so, I think we should move them to a separate PR to main, and merge before upgrading...