Michael Arnaldi

We can try to improve the error message but not sure we have enough info at runtime to make it nice

> > We can try to improve the error message but not sure we have enough info at runtime to make it nice > > Is there any way to...

TestClock has more functions than Clock so depending on Clock wouldn't make a difference On Mon, 20 May 2024, 22:42 Dmitry, ***@***.***> wrote: > not sure we have enough info...

@TheDevMinerTV is this related to the discord discussion? if yes then this is not an issue, if not we need a full repro

Hashing should use the same strategy we use to hash structs but we should probably add, in addition to the plain hash, something like a crc32. Reason being that hash...

> 5.0 please https://x.com/youyuxi/status/1839525812573552767 looks like it's going to be unflagged in node 22 too after a while

Array.sort is mutable so it can't be used directly, we'd have to clone the array leading to the same perf tradeoff

> would be more performant than `Array.sort(Order.number)` or `Array.sort(Order.string)` was answering to: ``` would be more performant than Array.sort(Order.number) or Array.sort(Order.string) ```

for the time being we won't do this as it can't work on things like catchTags

Nice!