Michele Bertasi

Number 1) sounds like a nice idea! I'm curious though. The permissions gmailctl requires are very limited (only labels and basic GMail settings, no email forwarding). There's very limited chance...

Ha, you're right. I wonder if I can get rid of that scope, which doesn't seem necessary at a first glance. In any case it seems like you won't be...

The metadata scope was a leftover from the past, thanks for checking. Gmailctl is more secure as a result :)

The current state is that gmailctl requires the `gmail.settings.basic` and `gmail.labels` which are quite harmless. True that there's still some risk, but whoever is keeping SSH keys locally is facing...

I agree that this would be an improvement for new users. The problem is the migration path for existing installations. I would avoid moving their files around, as many use...

The filter you see in the error will be "ignored in the diff", which is to say it won't be touched by gmailctl. I should make this more clear. The...

Uhm, you're right! I never realized the test was the opposite.

Ah yes, please. If you have a minute this would be helpful.

That's totally fine. Thanks a lot!

I'm inclined at this point to say that this is a nice to have but will probably not be implemented. The risk of breaking existing users, plus introducing a weird...