Mauro

Cool. Close this if it is resolved.

Any luck?

Yes, you were right, it didn't work, except with `ode4ms` and `ode5ms`. So you can either us above PR until it gets merged or use `ode*ms`. Thanks!

It would be fairly trivial to use a mutating `fn!` in my PR. However, I'm hesitant to make that PR much larger. Note however, that it is mainly a time-efficiency...

You could have a look whether the PR #72 is any good. Although those are implicit methods.

Your last comment was for #71, right?

We're overhauling ODE.jl currently and including doc-strings is definitely planned. Hopefully, not much longer until this can be closed...

The pressure is on...

From my side, it's ready to be merged. An alternative to your problem in #71 could also be to introduce a `poststep` function which gets executed after each step. This...

One thing I noted yesterday using DASSL is that the error message for an error in the objective function did not report in which function the error happened and was...