Luke Warlow

> maybe referring to these as “states” is the wrong way to be thinking about it Yeah that's probably my bad could have worded it better. Tried to avoid using...

As I mentioned in https://github.com/openui/open-ui/issues/836 I'm very supportive of speccing a listbox element alongside selectlist. I fear if we don't we'll end up with compat issues in future where people...

I would like this to follow selectlist and NOT follow focus. For two main reasons, I think consistency is key for these new elements to take off and having them...

We don't have to overload the speccing of this up front cause I know it'll probably get complicated, But being able to use listbox for the duallistbox paradigm (#878) would...

Are we able to close this now? Given we've reused select and it seems listbox will just be ``

This should be even easier now we have popover and soon anchor positioning as I imagine (at least Chrome and Firefox) will move to a web implementation for their picker...

This came out of https://github.com/whatwg/html/pull/9754#issuecomment-1787802085 which suggests a key use case developers wanted showPicker for was to be able to get the pickers even if the input isn't in the...

Would need discussion but I'm leaning towards making a touch friendly web based picker UI and using that everywhere. So a standardised version effectively.

Closing for now this will be more solvable once we have ::picker() base appearances for more controls.

See https://github.com/openui/open-ui/issues/415 for prior discussions. Going to update the description a little to make this a discussion about an opt-in way to achieve this declaratively.