Linas Vepštas

re-opened, the first one is still wrong, it should be (DefinedLinguisticConceptNode "quantity") and not (DefinedLinguisticConceptNode "det")

Oh, yes, right, makes perfect sense. The _predadj(kick, soft) confused me. Do you want _comparative(soft, kick) in addition to the predadj, or instead of it?

anyway, the stuff that is currently in the unit test for these comparatives is wrong and/or unreviewd. And relex is probably broken for these, anyway ...

? what's the problem? the output looks right to me ... what were you expecting?

`_det` should be generated for "An orange is tasty." and any other sentence with a, an, the, this, these, those ... Not sure what R2L has to do with this?

!? Well, a determiner is a determiner. For dis-embodied text, determiners offer little information, and its possible that relex tried to avoid generating them. However, for embodied chat, being able...

ahh, yes right ... if I recall correctly, a fuller support for _det is in the stanford compatibility files, and yes, originally, LG just stuck a definite/indefinite tag on the...

It almost surely best to avoid three-point functions like this. I think you want: filled_by (jar, $x) where $x could be "Peter" also, the passive-rule-2 seems backwards to me, I'm...

So I assume that "filled by Peter" becomes ``` EvaluationLink PredicateNode "by@211" ListLink PredicateNode "filled@123" ConceptNode "Peter@1987" ```

1) I'm sorry that I ever said "filled_by" in the early remark, I wasn't thinking. 2) by(filled, Peter) and with(filled, marbles) is the correct order. In both cases, "filled" is...