code-generator icon indicating copy to clipboard operation
code-generator copied to clipboard

applyconfiguration-gen generates incorrect Extract...Status()

Open Gchbg opened this issue 1 year ago • 10 comments

This has tested with 0.29.4, 0.30.0, and the current master branch.

applyconfiguration-gen generates (experimental!) ExtractXYZ() and ExtractXYZStatus() functions that take an object and deliver an applyconfiguration that only has those fields prefilled that are owned by a given field manager.

The ExtractXYZStatus() does not extract conditions correctly. In the status of our CRD we have standard Kubernetes conditions:

	// +patchStrategy=merge
	// +patchMergeKey=type
	// +optional
	Conditions []metav1.Condition `json:"conditions,omitempty" patchStrategy:"merge" patchMergeKey:"type" protobuf:"bytes,1,rep,name=conditions"`

In an object that has one condition set by a controller using SSA, a subsequent reconcile by the same controller (using the same field manager value in both cases) calls ExtractXYZStatus(), which extracts all other owned fields correctly, but the Conditions slice is always nil in the output applyconfiguration. This has the effect that every time the controller wants to set any other field in the status, it inadvertantly clears its own conditions.

Instead I would expect that the applyconfiguration contains the condition previously set by the same controller.

Gchbg avatar May 14 '24 15:05 Gchbg

The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough contributors to adequately respond to all issues.

This bot triages un-triaged issues according to the following rules:

  • After 90d of inactivity, lifecycle/stale is applied
  • After 30d of inactivity since lifecycle/stale was applied, lifecycle/rotten is applied
  • After 30d of inactivity since lifecycle/rotten was applied, the issue is closed

You can:

  • Mark this issue as fresh with /remove-lifecycle stale
  • Close this issue with /close
  • Offer to help out with Issue Triage

Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community.

/lifecycle stale

k8s-triage-robot avatar Aug 12 '24 15:08 k8s-triage-robot

/remove-lifecycle stale

Gchbg avatar Aug 12 '24 15:08 Gchbg

The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough contributors to adequately respond to all issues.

This bot triages un-triaged issues according to the following rules:

  • After 90d of inactivity, lifecycle/stale is applied
  • After 30d of inactivity since lifecycle/stale was applied, lifecycle/rotten is applied
  • After 30d of inactivity since lifecycle/rotten was applied, the issue is closed

You can:

  • Mark this issue as fresh with /remove-lifecycle stale
  • Close this issue with /close
  • Offer to help out with Issue Triage

Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community.

/lifecycle stale

k8s-triage-robot avatar Nov 10 '24 16:11 k8s-triage-robot

/remove-lifecycle stale

Gchbg avatar Nov 10 '24 16:11 Gchbg

The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough contributors to adequately respond to all issues.

This bot triages un-triaged issues according to the following rules:

  • After 90d of inactivity, lifecycle/stale is applied
  • After 30d of inactivity since lifecycle/stale was applied, lifecycle/rotten is applied
  • After 30d of inactivity since lifecycle/rotten was applied, the issue is closed

You can:

  • Mark this issue as fresh with /remove-lifecycle stale
  • Close this issue with /close
  • Offer to help out with Issue Triage

Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community.

/lifecycle stale

k8s-triage-robot avatar Feb 08 '25 17:02 k8s-triage-robot

/remove-lifecycle stale

Gchbg avatar Feb 10 '25 00:02 Gchbg