xgboost-operator
xgboost-operator copied to clipboard
kubeflow
[Feat] Test LightGBM based on XGboost Operator
LightGBM is also popular for the boosting tree model, thus, it is natural to demo or test how LGBM to run over XGboost Operator.
Issue-Label Bot is automatically applying the labels:
| Label | Probability |
|---|---|
| kind/feature | 0.81 |
| area/operator | 0.79 |
Please mark this comment with :thumbsup: or :thumbsdown: to give our bot feedback! Links: app homepage, dashboard and code for this bot.
![issue-label-bot[bot] avatar](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/27079?v=4 "Published by a pub.dev verified publisher"){kind=small}
Hmm this is XGBoost operator though. We should probably aim to provide better support and experience for XGBoost users. I don’t think LightGBM would need to be supported here.
Yes, I totally agree that we need to provide better user experience for XGBoost. For example, better Python SDK.
we can keep in mind that XGboost operator could be for any boosting tree related algorithm. Now, more and more groups are using LGBM. We can leave this into minor priority.
On Sun, May 10, 2020 at 1:15 PM Yuan Tang [email protected] wrote:
Hmm this is XGBoost operator though. We should probably aim to provide better supporting experience for XGBoost users. I don’t think LightGBM would need to be supported here.
— You are receiving this because you authored the thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/kubeflow/xgboost-operator/issues/56#issuecomment-626383172, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAK5R6LCA473ZF2MKHJYE6DRQ4DN7ANCNFSM4M44RIPQ .