Justin Bennett
Justin Bennett
Interesting suggestion. While that does a good job of aligning with the naming convention, I feel like it could be confusing about the context of when it runs. Is it...
You could still do a label, just error out if there's more than one. I think the current beforeAll, afterAll semantics are fine too though.
Could you provide a little more context? What maid file were you trying to run?
I think this will involve a few things. First, is support for powershell and cmd. That's probably the easiest thing. The next consideration: Should there be a fallback. i.e. a...
Yep, exactly that. We need to check to ensure the script execution language exists before running it... question is, how do we fail? We probably need a way to denote...
I think this would be easy enough to do with something like ```bash maid run app maid run desktop maid run electron ``` We could just take the processed markdown...
I suppose it'd be possible to just use `` and have that skip the next code block that it finds. That'd just be trickier to implement because it has to...
It seems to work... ```bash @ignore echo test ``` ```bash @ignore echo test ``` I'm not sure if it'd have wider negative implications though.
Actually, @natew, this might actually work now. `bash @ignore` won't be treated as a known type therefore shouldn't actually be ran... give it a try?
It could, but you'd break syntax highlighting.