John Stachurski

The answer to point 1 is yes. For the answers to the other questions, I think this is what's assumed in the link above (Cochrane) and other asset pricing literature....

Thanks @oyamad , I'll make those changes soon.

Thanks @shlff , that should be CamelCase. Actually we're going to change all classes to namedtuples.

Thanks @hsalberti , much appreciated. @oyamad , could you please review this when you have time?

I'm in favor of changing the names to something more informative. Let's not tie ourselves down to exactly replicating CompEcon. As long as we implement broadly similar functionality and have...

Many thanks @spspitze . Will investigate when I have a bit of time. (If you're willing to put in a PR that corrects those typos we would be very grateful.)

@Harveyt47 , I recommend you create a little test notebook where you try to understand random seeds and how they interact with numba and prange. You might need to do...

@Harveyt47, would you mind to let us know the status of this?

@davidrpugh Thanks for these suggestions. Here are my thoughts: I think at this stage option 1 would be better for QuantEcon since it's more straightforward. If you strongly prefer to...

@davidrpugh That sounds like a sensible path. If it suits you better you can take back the notebook that you've already contributed and put it in your separate repo with...