John Stachurski

Thanks for comments. We'll have a fancy machine at SMU within about 2 weeks that will have 256GB RAM so we were planning to wait for that. (Not that I...

This is an interesting discussion. The key issue is how advantageous it is to compute transition probabilities and rewards up front. My prior is that it is very advantageous, given...

@robertdkirkby Great. We're going to run some horse races soon and post the results somewhere. Probably [here](http://quantecon.org/notebooks.html).

I think it makes sense to collect these modules into a subpackage, even though it will break some users' code. Since subpackage names are best kept short, I propose `linmod`....

Thanks @HumphreyYang , much appreciated. Perhaps @mmcky will review and merge when he finishes his break.

@zlqs1985 It's been on our radar and it's a great suggestion. Thanks for reminding us. Is it generic enough that it should go in the library for people to import...

@zlqs1985 @davidrpugh @spencerlyon2 @albop Thanks all for this discussion. In the short term I'll try to include a version of Chris Carroll's 1D endogenous grid method in the lectures, along...

@oyamad I've looked through the lectures and that won't be an issue. @mmcky If you agree with deleting then let's coordinate with the changes in the lectures. I'll open a...

Yes, that would be great @Smit-create . The `tauchen` one has always bothered me. This one might need unifying as well: http://quantecon.github.io/QuantEcon.jl/latest/api/QuantEcon.html#QuantEcon.rouwenhorst The only issue is that these are breaking...

Thanks @Smit-create . The relevant PR is #664 . Is the idea to shift all Python to Julia equivalent? @mmcky We will have to be careful with this issue since...