Jacob Pratt

What if I want a local of the same name?

Nothing has _ever_ prevented someone from creating a local with a valid identifier as a name. Why should that change?

Perhaps I should be clearer. If I can create a local binding (which I _think_ you're saying you can), how would I then access the private member? That's an absolute...

I gave you a -1 because I don't believe you have fully thought this through, and that your proposal is not feasible. Your solution to my concern is hacked together....

You didn't really answer his question. How could you do `static compare(a, b) { return a.#hashCode === b.#hashCode; }` **without** leaking it via a mandatory public field? A simple code...

@ljharb Perhaps there should be. A number of people feel this was rushed.

@rustbot modify labels to +a-imports +only-with-option

Also, `proc_macro` should probably be grouped with `std`, `alloc`, and `core`.

Of course the definition of "local" is up for debate, but under the definition currently used, wouldn't it be possible to just see if there is a `mod foo` in...

FWIW while I'd like to see this stabilized, this option can also break markdown. Last time I tried, a large markdown table I had was wrapped, which meant it was...