Jay Holsapple

Yeah, I looked at your repo. Nice work, BTW. I'll post my reply there to keep this thread clean. > @jcholsap Sorry, let me clarify. I support the Intel version...

I can contribute about (3) T430s +dGPU devices for now but can't commit much brain power until January probably.

Okay, okay. Looks like we have some testers then. I'll post back in one or two weeks. Meanwhile I'll try to have them ready. Also you may want to protect...

I'll take care of that. Just super busy, that's all. Want to keep the thread pertinent. But I'm getting excited about it. Supporting the T430s "shouldn't" be hard. But it...

As you can see, I made *some* progress this weekend. This is a project I've been formulating for a year and am finally now making it happen.

The flashrom utility is telling you that it did not flash the bottom chip. It also saying that it could not automatically determine the details of that chip. Compare to...

The way I remember it: The CVE referenced pertains to people being able to flash the BIOS firmware, i.e., skulls and hamish. The fix from Lenovo was a firmware update...

A Theory: Electronically, it seems plausible, since we are all using some sort of cobbled tool and programming the EERPOM in circuit, that some cells were in a quasi state...

I'm willing to bounce ideas back to you. * Reading your error log, it looks like a hardware device has failed to initialize after three attempts. It mentions "link layer"...

My understanding is that TPM v2.0 adds a hash check to firmware blocks that the EC verifies for "security". The result probably being, since mods change the hash value, that...