James Hickey

Yes, this is not available at the moment. It is a feature that's on the radar though, but no def. timeframe at the moment. Will update this thread when progress...

#139

Thanks for this! I'm actually thinking about re-working some of the queuing API significantly to be able handle cases where, let's say, an invocable that can be queued with a...

If you're still up to it, let's get these changes in. I do have ideas long term like I mentioned, but these changes here are good. Did you also want...

Hey @karthikveeraj, just checking if you're still interested in completing this? Thanks again for your effort and time 👍

This is something I want to add to the open-source library and is currently not in the Pro version either (I had considered making it paid but think it's more...

Plans, yes...specific timeline, no lol Hasn't been the most productive year (2020) 😅

Thanks for this. Yes, this will require some changes to how the internals of the dispatcher work. But this scenario does make sense and I can see why it ought...

Not at the moment. You'd have to stop the .NET process and bring it back up. Unless there's a way to hook into the .NET framework and "stop" all background...

You would need to restart the .NET application / process to re-build the schedules since everything is built at application start-up. My comment about restarting the "worker service" is related...