Melissa Kilby

@Molter73 since you are out I assume +1 for you as well since you opened the proposal in the first place.

> My personal opinion is that if the loader changes are needed only for a forked version of libs, they should live in the fork if possible. Please note that...

Quick note: @gnosek I like the progression you described here https://github.com/falcosecurity/libs/issues/1527#issuecomment-1845012162 very much and appreciate the technical details as well 😉 I also think that down the road (assuming the...

> driver testing has been a huge effort historically This proposal for now is about scap changes only to load a custom probe. Therefore, I don't see this impacting our...

/milestone 0.38.0

Fully supportive, see also my comment in the libs equivalent ticket https://github.com/falcosecurity/libs/issues/1747#issuecomment-1997893695.

Let us check. There was some discussion going on here https://github.com/falcosecurity/libs/issues/1134#issuecomment-1593459072.

Oh this is a real bummer, I wasn't aware Falco would just crash in such cases, re specifically the `exe_flags=%evt.arg.flags` besides renaming it to flags we should adjust all upstream...

Thanks for the clarification and also thanks for looking into it!

@Andreagit97 could you rebase? I think we could start getting this over the finish line if you would like, I'll help as reviewer, thank you!