Alec Theriault

> @harpocrates Do we have this data from what Haddock parses or does it need a deeper addition to what it can do? In other terms, is that a displaying...

> Haddock still needs to use the GHC API for some non-parsing stuff right? Yes. At the very least, Haddock needs to be able to construct type signatures of top-level...

The title of the issue is not a good idea. I frequently use inline code for stuff that is _not_ Haskell. If anything, we might want to add support for...

I see you that `haddock-api/resources/html/package-lock.json` was removed and `haddock-api/resources/html/yarn.lock` added. What is the reason for this? Otherwise, this seems reasonable. Ideally, the UI would not be blocked while it searches,...

Right, QuickJump could stand to have nicer API 😄. But this PR is a definite improvement, so let's get it merged! > I switched from npm package manager to yarn...

@gbaz Isn't this fixed? I seem to be successfully generating and using local docs with quickjump. If it isn't fixed, could you perhaps add some repro instructions?

Nope, I'm not running an HTTP server. Proof this works with `file://`: On closer inspection: this must be a recent Firefox feature, since Chrome still fails: "Failed to load file...

> Duplicate of #23? Definitely not - this is much simpler! In fact, I think this is quite achievable even today. We just need to tweak the ghc grammar to...

Thanks for the ping - this is still very much on my radar. Hi Haddock is not yet done, though it hopefully will be come end of next month! Once...

I'm unfortunately not surprised. The the change to `attachInstances` that likely caused this regression is https://github.com/haskell/haddock/pull/724. The last version of Haddock was not looking for instances in enough places, which...