Philip Jägenstedt

Right now the latest results are just broken, so I can't check what the most recent run did: https://wpt.fyi/cssom/serialize-values.html

I think it would be valuable to ensure that the configuration for Chrome and Firefox are as similar as possible or even identical on wpt.fyi running infra and Travis, that...

Given that we want `wpt run` to work on tests writers' machines and that browsers themselves strive for consistency across even different operating systems, I think that process level synchronization...

Thanks for filing those issues, will comment there! > With all the talk about revision announcers and vendor-supplied test results, I actually wasn't sure how you're thinking about testing Edge...

@domenic, you built the WHATWG status checks, is https://developer.github.com/v3/guides/building-a-ci-server/ the right documentation to start from?

Can we also use TaskCluster for wpt.fyi, at least for Linux? Having two tech stacks is itself part of the problem/nuisance. If there's no path for running *fresh* Windows Insider...

On the governance, I share those exact concerns/biases, and my ideal is really that each browser vendors takes care of running its own browser and submitting results to wpt.fyi, *but*...

@mariestaver, I noticed the "Needs Attention" label. Is that a label I should use for things that I think, well, need attention? I just added the priority:roadmap label here, but...

Thanks, I'll use that label when it seems more important than usual.

> Because @foolip made the mistake of complimenting my ASCII "art" in a recent presentation I don't regret it, still loving your ASCII art :) The third diagram is similar...