firebase-admin-node
firebase-admin-node copied to clipboard
Cannot find module 'firebase-admin/app'
package.json requirements look like this –
"dependencies": {
"@sentry/node": "^5.30.0",
"body-parser": "1.19.0",
"express": "^4.17.1",
"firebase-admin": "10.0.0",
"mysql": "^2.18.1",
"pug": "3.0.2"
}
node_modules has the corresponding module in the path ~/node_modules/firebase-admin/lib/app
Node code reads as –
const initializeApp = require('firebase-admin/app');
And when the app is run, the following stacktrace emerges.
Error: Cannot find module 'firebase-admin/app'
at Function.Module._resolveFilename (module.js:547:15)
at Function.Module._load (module.js:474:25)
at Module.require (module.js:596:17)
at require (internal/module.js:11:18)
at Object.<anonymous> (/var/www/html/project/backend/main.js:16:24)
at Module._compile (module.js:652:30)
at Object.Module._extensions..js (module.js:663:10)
at Module.load (module.js:565:32)
at tryModuleLoad (module.js:505:12)
at Function.Module._load (module.js:497:3)
I found a few problems with this issue:
- I couldn't figure out how to label this issue, so I've labeled it for a human to triage. Hang tight.
- This issue does not seem to follow the issue template. Make sure you provide all the required information.
I have the same issue. For some reason, running npm install resolved the error when running mocha tests from a non-debug terminal instance in Visual Studio Code, but running mocha tests from a debug terminal instance still yields this error. The node_modules package is definitely installed.
Solved it by ignoring the import recommendation. Instead of
'use strict';
const { initializeApp } = require('firebase-admin/app');
const { getFirestore, Timestamp, GeoPoint } = require('firebase-admin/firestore');
exports.initializeApp = () => initializeApp();
exports.getFirestore = () => getFirestore();
exports.Timestamp = Timestamp;
exports.GeoPoint = GeoPoint;
I am now using what existed before v10:
'use strict';
const firebaseAdmin = require('firebase-admin');
exports.initializeApp = () => firebaseAdmin.initializeApp();
exports.getFirestore = () => firebaseAdmin.firestore();
exports.Timestamp = firebaseAdmin.firestore.Timestamp;
exports.GeoPoint = firebaseAdmin.firestore.GeoPoint;
Code given above worked fine when executed through Node.js 12. Here's the output of the execution with an added console.log statement:
% cat main.js
'use strict';
const { initializeApp } = require('firebase-admin/app');
const { getFirestore, Timestamp, GeoPoint } = require('firebase-admin/firestore');
exports.initializeApp = () => initializeApp();
exports.getFirestore = () => getFirestore();
exports.Timestamp = Timestamp;
exports.GeoPoint = GeoPoint;
console.log(exports);
% node main.js
{
initializeApp: [Function],
getFirestore: [Function],
Timestamp: [class Timestamp],
GeoPoint: [class GeoPoint]
}
Also I can do the following on a Node.js REPL:
% node
Welcome to Node.js v12.22.0.
Type ".help" for more information.
> const { initializeApp } = require('firebase-admin/app')
undefined
> initializeApp
[Function: initializeApp]
May be somebody can share a minimal and complete repro of the issue? Something that we can download and run to repro the problem?
@hiranya911 I am currently using node v17.0.1. Is it known to not work with this? Is the solution to downgrade to v12 instead?
Edit – I can confirm that downgrading to v12 did solve the issue.
@shalbert94 Importing the top level module and then accessing internal things like you suggested works. That is exactly the workaround that I proceeded with.
So, either the docs need updating, or the library itself does.
Works fine on Node 17 too:
$ node
Welcome to Node.js v17.0.1.
Type ".help" for more information.
> const { initializeApp } = require('firebase-admin/app')
undefined
> initializeApp
[Function: initializeApp]
This is most likely a problem specific to your environment/implementation. We will need a complete, minimal repro to know for sure.
As fas as our library is concerned, we correctly declare the new module entry points in our package.json file:
https://github.com/firebase/firebase-admin-node/blob/b26501b023194b664df5d81f526e237f975fae71/package.json#L106-L111
All Node.js versions 12 and up, should support it.
Edit – I can confirm that downgrading to v12 did solve the issue.
Assuming there are no other libraries, frameworks or custom module loaders in play, more likely explanation is your Node 17 setup was somehow loading an old version of firebase-admin (e.g. v9), that didn't have the new module exports. Changing to Node 12 pulled in the latest version of the library, and picked up the new entry points. Just a guess.
I pushed a copy of my attempt to repro this issue to https://github.com/firebase/firebase-admin-node/tree/hkj-repro-1488/nodetest. Feel free to play with it and see if you can still repro the problem.
I'm also getting this error when using the snippet provided:
import { initializeApp, applicationDefault } from 'firebase-admin/app';
=> Error: Cannot find module 'firebase-admin/app'
Node v14.16.1
Confirming that using import firebaseAdmin from 'firebase-admin' resolves it, however that's a big headache. For now I've given up on this approach and gone back to using import Firestore from '@google-cloud/firestore' (and it looks like firebase-admin just wraps that anyway so no harm I guess?)
@Bandit can you share a complete repro with us? Something similar to the complete example I've shared above in my last comment.
Folks who are seeing this error also please check their library version using one of the following methods:
Using npm ls
$ npm ls firebase-admin
[email protected]
└── [email protected]
Directly checking the package.json of the library
$ grep "version" node_modules/firebase-admin/package.json
"version": "10.0.0"
If the version is indeed 10.x or higher, please share a complete repro that we can run.
Confirmed I'm using [email protected]
I'll see about building a repro when I get some time, but I'm assuming it's related to Vite (using Vite + Sveltekit). Perhaps fixed by this hot-off-the-press PR https://github.com/vitejs/vite/pull/5593? Or maybe it's this bug https://github.com/vitejs/vite/issues/4340? Bit beyond my pay grade
We encountered the issue in Vite during alpha testing. See #1340 (also https://github.com/vitejs/vite/issues/3953). It's a bug in their module resolver. We cannot do much about that on our end, but it sounds like the PR you've linked above is expected to fix it.
Other platforms with known issues include Jest and ESLint (see #1481)
Can confirm this is an issue when creating a graphql express application. Version is 10.0.0
import { initializeApp } from "firebase-admin/app"
import { getAuth } from "firebase-admin/lib/auth"
const firebaseApp = initializeApp()
const auth = getAuth(firebaseApp)
> nodemon ./src/index.ts
[nodemon] 2.0.15
[nodemon] to restart at any time, enter `rs`
[nodemon] watching path(s): src\**\*.ts
[nodemon] watching extensions: ts,json
[nodemon] starting `ts-node ./src/index.ts`
Error [ERR_PACKAGE_PATH_NOT_EXPORTED]: Package subpath './lib/auth' is not defined by "exports" in E:\TrailTrek\trail-trek-back\node_modules\firebase-admin\package.json
at new NodeError (node:internal/errors:363:5)
at throwExportsNotFound (node:internal/modules/esm/resolve:335:9)
at packageExportsResolve (node:internal/modules/esm/resolve:560:3)
at resolveExports (node:internal/modules/cjs/loader:476:36)
at Function.Module._findPath (node:internal/modules/cjs/loader:516:31)
at Function.Module._resolveFilename (node:internal/modules/cjs/loader:913:27)
at Function.Module._resolveFilename.sharedData.moduleResolveFilenameHook.installedValue [as _resolveFilename] (C:\ProgramData\nvm\v16.4.0\node_modules\ts-node\node_modules\@cspotcode\source-map-support\source-map-support.js:679:30)
at Function.Module._load (node:internal/modules/cjs/loader:772:27)
at Module.require (node:internal/modules/cjs/loader:999:19)
at require (node:internal/modules/cjs/helpers:93:18) {
code: 'ERR_PACKAGE_PATH_NOT_EXPORTED'
@DallasP9124 your import is wrong:
import { getAuth } from "firebase-admin/lib/auth"
Should be corrected as:
import { getAuth } from "firebase-admin/auth"
Can confirm this issue occurs, as of today, on
node --version
v14.18.0
Repro is just following the firebase setup docs, albeit with typescript imports. https://firebase.google.com/docs/admin/setup
Update: Visual Studio code is able to see the firebase-admin/app module though. Its just that when I run a test case with jest with minimal setup of FCM admin, the error occurs.
Looks like my issue is more related to: https://github.com/firebase/firebase-admin-node/issues/1481
For now, the workaround is good.
@hiranya911 that did fix it. I was using WebStorm and it resolved the import to the wrong location.
I got fixed by updating fireabse-admin and node version as below.
firebase-admin: 10.0.0
node: v14.15.4
any updates on this issue ? I am not able to use modular imports on Node 16
Cannot find module 'firebase-admin/auth'
My installed version is 10.0.0
I started getting this after installing the eslint-plugin-node module and enabling the plugin. The rule node/no-missing-import was causing the error. I fixed it by adding allowModules: ["firebase-admin"] in the rule config, like this:
"node/no-missing-import": [
"error",
{
allowModules: ["firebase-admin"],
},
],
@TheSecurityDev Yes, ESLint is another known case. See my earlier comment https://github.com/firebase/firebase-admin-node/issues/1488#issuecomment-963929557
Open bug report in ESLint project: https://github.com/import-js/eslint-plugin-import/issues/1868
Same problem here. The suggested method in the documentation did not work.
However this solved it:
import * as admin from 'firebase-admin';
admin.initializeApp();
const db = admin.firestore();
const bucket = admin.storage().bucket();
const auth = admin.auth();
same problem
node: v16.13.0
"typescript": "^4.5.4"
"firebase-admin": "^10.0.1",
"ts-node": "^10.4.0",
"ts-node-dev": "2.0.0-0",
eslint
{
'import/no-unresolved': [
'error',
{
ignore: ['^firebase-admin/.+'],
},
],
'node/no-missing-import': [
'error',
{
allowModules: ['firebase-admin'],
},
],
}
working only importing type
import type { MulticastMessage } from 'firebase-admin/messaging'
thx @pooyasa I also had to go back
A co-worker had a similar issue, so just chiming in in case it helps someone. Basically, make sure you're running tooling that supports package.json exports field.
firebase-admin/app isn't a real file on disk, it's mapped as per:
https://github.com/firebase/firebase-admin-node/blob/7b15b27f2cfe05200fae1f907f9048788ac42e4c/package.json#L108-L111
In our case we were seeing discrepancies between developers' machines. Ensuring everyone was running Node 12.7 or greater resolved the issue.
Had the same error in v9.5, works fine in v10 if I dont use firebase-functions and strictly use the submodules (firebase-functions/app, /auth, etc)
I started to use firebase-admin@^10.0.1 and I had this error when running jest tests. It couldn't map "firebase-admin/app" to "firebase-admin/lib/app" as expected. So I have mapped this manually on jest.config.ts:
import { pathsToModuleNameMapper } from 'ts-jest/utils';
import { compilerOptions } from './tsconfig.json';
...
export default {
...
moduleNameMapper: pathsToModuleNameMapper(
{
...compilerOptions.paths,
'firebase-admin/*': ['node_modules/firebase-admin/lib/*'],
},
{
prefix: '<rootDir>',
},
),
...
}
That worked for me.
And just to note, my tsconfig.json is like this:
{
"compilerOptions": {
...
"baseUrl": ".",
"paths": {
"modules/*": [
"src/modules/*"
],
"shared/*": [
"src/shared/*"
],
}
}
}
Hi, See that : https://firebase.google.com/docs/admin/migrate-node-v10#es-modules-support
Similarly to @HelderSi, I had to do a moduleNameMapper config, but I'm using yarn v2 PnP, so my config looks like this:
import { pathsToModuleNameMapper } from "ts-jest/utils";
export default {
preset: "ts-jest",
testEnvironment: "node",
modulePaths: ["<rootDir>/src"],
moduleNameMapper: pathsToModuleNameMapper({
"firebase-admin/*": ["firebase-admin/lib/*"],
}),
};
For some reason npm pulled v9 for me, I manually edited my package.json (remember it's the one in the functions folder):
"firebase-admin": "^10.0.2",
All imports are working correctly now.