Ferran Basora

Indeed. I would be a really nice addition and it is relatively easy to implement.

I added this issue weeks ago https://github.com/fcsonline/drill/issues/64 to evaluate if we can add this kind of this to drill, but it will not happen in the short term.

Glad to read this. Whatever feedback about async will be awesome. > However, it took som time before I found out that benchmark.yaml expected “threads” instead of “concurrency” since all...

Ok, now I understand a bit more the kind of test you want to achieve. I'll think about it to know which is the best and more flexible way to...

Since the early days of `drill`, iterations have always been equals between them. The problem here is that there is an initial step where the `Benchmark` structure (the list of...

Hi! Adding json output could be a really nice addition. Before start implementing this, make a proposal of the json structure to check that everybody is fine with it and...

Thanks for you report. Some users compared `ab` with `drill`. I'm going to try to explain what is going on here. Although `drill` and `ab` are tools that can be...

Also, I can see that you are using the keep-alive flag in `ab`. Right now, `drill` doesn't support it. This could add an extra delay for each request connection initialization.

This last report looks more comparable. 👌 I'm going to investigate it.

I merged some commits that improve the performance. I found that SSL connector was adding an important delay. Could you pull from master and try it again?