Euan Torano

That's what we've always said in the past. A lot of the time debs barely have enough time to concentrate on the core, never mind other packages. > On 21...

No, phpBB doesn't. We shouldn't limit ourselves just to features they have though. If a feature is useful, there's no reason not to add it IMO. > On 21 Mar...

We should probably ask the community once the alpha goes public. I think it's extremely useful in the core personally rather than being an official add on. > On 21...

Also note that official plugins will require official level support. The current support team struggles as is. We'll have to do significant recruitment if we're going to maintain official plugins....

Also note that the milestone for this issue is Alpha 2, which was set for this exact reason ;) Issues tagged for Alpha 1 should be far more pressing and...

I'm going to open this up to the community today and get their feedback.

This is now an open community discussion, any discussion regarding whether this should or should not be implemented should occur in public, here: http://community.mybb.com/thread-175669.html This issue is left open so...

Hi, What did you do to cause this error? Simply providing the error message isn't of much help when working out the cause of a bug.

Hi, I think it's more a problem with our validation rules, which are in the wrong place anyway (they should be in a request class).

Of course. That's what that feature means. > On 21 Mar 2015, at 04:02, Omar Gonzalez [email protected] wrote: > > When tagged in a piece of content they can view,...