ee7

Results 96 comments of ee7

Thanks for the quick response. Are you sure the test failures are related? On both `master` and this branch I see the same failures, in the "Go tests" part of...

I see that @narimiran changed the date - does that mean this is going to be posted soon? This article currently advertises "safe to use" quite a lot. But did...

Just FYI: `configlet lint` will soon say something like: > The slug `leap` is used for both a Concept Exercise and a Practice Exercise, but must only appear once on...

I like the idea to align the types. But if we compile the top post's snippet > ```Nim > when true: > proc fn1(a: int) = discard > var fn:...

> ``` > gotten X > wanted Y > ``` I don't like it. It's best to avoid "gotten", since it's less common outside of North America. But it's also...

Apologies for the slow reply. > or else please suggest an alternative that fits the bill? I can only see a present tense option ``` have X want Y ```...

> (and keep the spaces in each case regardless of `--declaredLocs` to avoid impacting search) Are you saying that the default compiler output, without `--declaredLocs`, would look something like these?...

> Is this on purpose or should this be added? I believe it's an oversight - it should be added. It's documented elsewhere: https://github.com/exercism/docs/blob/6a0731ff768ff97db524dfbaaadb73a99a754a18/building/configlet/lint.md#L103-L107 https://github.com/exercism/docs/blob/6a0731ff768ff97db524dfbaaadb73a99a754a18/building/configlet/lint.md#L237-L245 https://github.com/exercism/docs/blob/6a0731ff768ff97db524dfbaaadb73a99a754a18/building/configlet/lint.md#L314-L322 https://github.com/exercism/docs/blob/6a0731ff768ff97db524dfbaaadb73a99a754a18/building/tracks/concept-exercises.md#L323 https://github.com/exercism/docs/blob/6a0731ff768ff97db524dfbaaadb73a99a754a18/building/tracks/practice-exercises.md#L284

Cool. I was thinking about this too. I saw that `std.math.log10` accepted integers, but didn't advertise that there was a round-trip float conversion: https://github.com/ziglang/zig/blob/36d47dd1991f0ccd7a9673075624f09500cc415e/lib/std/math/log10.zig#L13-L25 and so produced incorrect results for...

I guess `algorithms` is a bit better. But I've never accidentally written `algorithms` instead of `algorithm`. If we accept this RFC, I'd suggest that we decide on the naming scheme...