Emile Cormier

Could we get WAMP-SCRAM in that list? How soon did you want to resubmit?

@oberstet Now that I think about it, perhaps someone should implement a proof-of-concept implementation to work out the kinks in WAMP-SCRAM before it is submitted as part of the RFC....

Since CppWAMP is client-only, I leave it to others to write a prototype implementation. My spec draft translates the ABNF from the SCRAM RFC into pseudocode that should be easier...

1. Does it make sense to be able to override the `authid` and `authrole`? If so, what would be a use case? 2. With multi-factor auth, should `WELCOME.Details.authextra` be an...

@oberstet Re: `authextra` in the `WELCOME` message. I don't think you're seeing the potential problem - I'm sorry if I didn't explain it properly. WAMP-SCRAM needs to return a `verifier`...

@oberstet > When the effective (after applying override rules) authids or authroles of two authentication methods in a multi-factor authentication scheme (are present and) differ, then .. this is an...

> these must not differ for the authmethods in a multi-factor auth scheme, but they can differ between the authmethods at the top level. and they often do, when the...

Whatever is decided, there needs to be a way for non-members of the DAO to participate in discussions even if they don't get a vote. I want my relationship with...

> what do you think? would that work for your situation, do you think this is a good approach in general? I prefer not to tell you how to manage...

Should it be permitted to send `CANCEL` without specifying the mode? If so, which mode is assumed by default?