parsedmarc

parsedmarc copied to clipboard

Hi

Have you planed that your tool can analyze the report from mta-sts (TLSRPTv1) too?

Or do you know another software for this?

Thank you for help

URIports supports MTA-STS and DANE TLS-RPT reports.

I just glanced over the RFC. This looks like it would be easy to add. Not sure when I'll get to it though.

@freddieleeman all point in self-hosted solutions is that they self-hosted. You not share your personal and company info with 3rd parties when you have possibility host own solution. It will be cool if parsedmarc will have this future :+1:

Hi @seanthegeek I can send you sample data for mta-sts and tlsa reports if it will help you. Do you need them?

@dragoangel That would be great!

@seanthegeek I contact you in PM on twitter

@dragoangel That would be great!

Do you need more reports? I'm getting some incoming, and no clue how to read them. :-)

I haven't even had the chance to read over what @dragoangel sent me. 😋 I'll keep that in mind though. Thanks.

@NoSubstitute no clue how to read them

TLS Reports are JSON formated mostly to one line. To get there more visibility you need format them to pretty json (using online tools, or text app, e.g: Notepad++ JSTool plugin, etc).

@NoSubstitute no clue how to read them

TLS Reports are JSON formated mostly to one line. To get there more visibility you need format them to pretty json (using online tools, or text app, e.g: Notepad++ JSTool plugin, etc).

Thanks. The NP++ plugin made it easier to read. Still, a nicely aggregated statistical view would be nice.

It would be a splendid feature. Is anyone aware of a currently existing self-hosted TLS-RPT analyzer/dashboard?

I've done a quick solution for this writing only to json output; so no analyzing or anything just re-using the automatic imap-mailbox handling. (It's enough for my use case)

Maybe some on can use this as a starting point for a real implementation: https://github.com/tbsmark86/parsedmarc/commit/990f8df60baa017fcd5aad9871c00f70f3dcafc7

+1 for TLS reports feature.

+1 for that feature.

+1, please support it

+1 !

+1 for MTA-STS support

+1 for MTA-STS

+1 for MTA-STS

+1 for MTA-STS

Is there something new on this? I've discovered this project today and for my use case is this is the only feature, which I miss.

+1 !

+1 for MTA-STS support

+1 :)

To those who want TLS Reporting.. Have you set it up, and receiving reports ? Can I get some replies from who you receive TLS Reports from ?

I can start out:

• Google

• Google Inc.
• Microsoft Corporation
• SocketLabs
• Comcast
• Mail.ru
• Mimecast

And an additional 20 that lack significance.

I agree that google.com and microsoft.com are majority of emails here.

However, adding the following:

• yahoo.de
• yahoo.co.uk
• yahoo.com
• verizon.net

Are you sure? Haven't seen a single report, and we process thousands daily.

If they do, they are probably not RFC compliant.

SMTP-TLS reports I receive are from Google.

• Google Inc.

  • Microsoft Corporation

  • SocketLabs

  • Comcast

  • Mail.ru

  • Mimecast

And an additional 20 that lack significance.

It'a amazing so many sends TLS Reports now. Only a few years ago, only 4 was sending reports, where Microsoft was the last coming to the group. : https://www.mailhardener.com/blog/microsoft-has-begun-sending-smtp-tls-reports Never got any from Mimecast. Would like to see that report. Is the TLS reports you receive from all those different senders RFC Compliant, or is any still lacking behind ?