jwt-vc-presentation-profile
                                
                                
                                
                                    jwt-vc-presentation-profile copied to clipboard
                            
                            
                            
                        I think at some point we had a requirement in the document to pass a prefer-header `JWT-interop-profile-0.0.1` when the wallet obtains authorization request object. but I can't find it in...
Are there any plans to update this profile to the OpenID4VP second implementer's draft (https://openid.net/2023/05/01/second-implementers-draft-of-openid-for-verifiable-presentations-specification-approved/) Thanks!
Hi All, In NL several Dutch SSI vendors (TNO, Dutch Blockchain Coalition, Sphereon, Animo) have started work on a new interop profile which for now has the work title Dutch...
~~In the SIOPv2 spec the iss value possibilities were changed from a static https://self-issued.me/v2 (see PR for the change https://bitbucket.org/openid/connect/pull-requests/120). Basically the iss is the sub for a SIOP. See...
adds a new section that defines a verified domain jwt that allows a third party to prove a binding btw a DID and a domain. I think more clarifications can...
Our Presentation Exchange library conforms to PE v1. In our library we are enforcing that a schema URI is a valid URI according to https://identity.foundation/presentation-exchange/spec/v1.0.0/#input-descriptor-object In this profile an example...
Typo
The abstract is terrific. Is there a word missing here, "It also clarifies mandatory to implement features for the optionalities mentioned in the referenced specifications." What is mandatory? Are the...
During one of the last meetings I believe we heard from @nklomp that their consortium liked many aspects of the profile but was unsure on the requirement to use Well...