Cas Wognum

We had a similar issue in [Polaris](https://github.com/polaris-hub/polaris/pull/79#issuecomment-2007389016)! This seems to be an upstream issue. `get_adjustment()` was moved to `pandas.io.formats.printing` in [this PR](https://github.com/pandas-dev/pandas/pull/55467). It was fixed in RDKit in [this PR](https://github.com/rdkit/rdkit/pull/7165)....

Since these two releases are fairly recent, you probably break less by setting an upper limit for now?

@azkalot1 Could you share your Pydantic version? Besides a too broad except statement ([here?](https://github.com/datamol-io/molfeat/blob/main/molfeat/store/loader.py#L101-L103)), it seems to me that we are lacking a lower bound for the pydantic version in...

Possibly use a Google Colab instead, since the start-up times for the Datamol binder seem excessive (>30 min).

Sorry for deleting my comment, after posting it I realized my question didn't make sense and was hoping to update it before you saw it! :sweat_smile: The question I intended...

Hey @danielfrg, any update on the above?

Thanks @danielfrg ! Fixed for conda-forge with https://github.com/conda-forge/mkdocs-jupyter-feedstock/pull/35 as well.

That makes perfect sense to me. Thank you for the quick response! Would you like me to keep this issue open to track the change to "unknown"?

@oprypin I think it actually made it into a release, it's just the conda-forge release is broken. See https://github.com/danielfrg/mkdocs-jupyter/issues/197 and https://github.com/conda-forge/mkdocs-jupyter-feedstock/issues/31

@xhochy @padix-key Any update now that the new `conda-build` release is out? I'm still new to the conda forge, but happy to help if I can!