aruba
aruba copied to clipboard
Review step wording
trafficstars
Summary
Go over the wording of the cucumber steps and make it nicer.
Context & Motivation
Some wording is a little inconsistent or unclear. We should improve it and deprecate the bad old wording. As a follow-up, the bad wording can be removed in a major version.
Details
(I'm going to collect bad wording below):
- [ ] Change 'the specs should not pass with' to 'the specs should fail with' to make it clear that the given doc string will be the expected output. With the current wording, it seems like passing with different output would satisfy the step. Variants for features should also be updated
- [ ] ...
This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed in a week if no further activity occurs.
Delaying this to at least 1.1