Charles Sprayberry

FWIW I have a fairly extensive Container test suite that's been utilizing `v7.x-dev` with 8.1 for quite some time and everything has worked great.

@kelunik FWIW the code that has the HttpServer injected is also the code that "owns" the instance. I'm wrapping some other events, route autowiring, and middleware setup before the server...

An unforeseen complication is a requirement that we implicitly create our own service delegate when we create the Container. We can't just pass an array of strings and expect Auryn,...

Regarding the `#[ServicePrepare]` issue I believe that this is not a concern. The most current implementation of the `AurynContainerFactory` can effectively handle this by directly determining which parameters to pass...

The only real concern with this is that you could potentially define a `#[ServiceDelegate]` for a type that also has a `#[ServiceCollection]` annotation. We'll need to figure out whether to...

When you think about it, the `#[Inject]` Attribute is already responsible for deciding what values get used when they can't be resolved implicitly. Instead of introducing a new Attribute, and...

To support this we're going to have to do some fairly heavy lifting on `AnnotatedContainer::invoke()` to work properly. It doesn't appear to be supported out-of-the-box by laminas/laminas-servicemanager.

The new design of this library is quite different from its predecessor. More time will be needed to best understand how to implement this ContainerFactory.

This will be feasible to implement once we introduce a semantic Cache instance and implementations. Right now there's no easy way to test this.

This is currently blocked on ProxyManager supporting 8.1