Dmitrii Kovanikov

Results 393 issues of Dmitrii Kovanikov

By following awesome instructions from @vrom911: * https://vrom911.github.io/blog/github-actions-releases And remove the old system with AppVeyor and Travis. Also, we can add Dependabot to the Summoner as well since we will...

CI

This issue tracks Nix support in Summoner. Nix seems to be widespread in the Haskell community, and some people can benefit from having Nix with established best-practices in scaffolded projects....

question
generated project
CI
nix

So it will look like this: ```toml [prelude] package = "relude" module = "Relude" version = "0.6.0.0" ``` And in the `.cabal` file you'll have `relude ^>= 0.6.0.0` **Open questions**...

generated project
config

See discussion in this PR: * https://github.com/kowainik/summoner/pull/164#issuecomment-427236215 The following workaround exists: * https://github.com/haskell-CI/haskell-ci/issues/95 But we're waiting for this `cabal` issue to be resolved first: * https://github.com/haskell/cabal/issues/3883

generated project
CI
wontfix

It was proposed during the work on #333 to implement `TreeFs` like this: ```haskell data TreeFs = Dir (Map FilePath TreeFs) | File Text ``` This structure has some benefits:...

question
refactoring

Currently we use TOML format for initial default config for project scaffolding. See the example of config here: * https://github.com/kowainik/org/blob/master/.summoner.toml But it would be nice to support Dhall as well....

feature
config

Currently we show project structure on-the-fly. But it would be better to make `Project structure` widget smarter, like, scrollable list that allows to open file and browse it's content so...

feature
TUI

Just a collection of some ideas to improve the course and make some tasks better. A few things I have on my mind and discussed with @vrom911: - [ ]...

task

Consider the following demo: * https://asciinema.org/a/214424 This unicode symbol is used: ⓘ And because of that some borders are aligned weirdly. Everything works fine locally :+1:

Currently if I want to run all property-based tests, I need to put them all into single group. But I would like to separate my test groups into different modules....