Christoph Ruegg

Results 131 comments of Christoph Ruegg

I think what would help most to finally move forward here is to start exposing the relevant routines in the MKL wrapper and map them in `SafeNativeMethods`. - Figure out...

FYI, currently in mainline in the la-knuth branch.

Thanks for the input! Which version are you using? I have recently spent some time in this area, mainly on adding native provider support (MKL for now, but I'd like...

Sorry for the late response. I've been experimenting a bit with a new `literate` documentation approach ([example](http://numerics.mathdotnet.com/docs/)) that mixes executable sample code with documentation. Locally I've also extended it with...

I guess we could have a global Control instance like in Numerics to control how a few operations like power behave on very large input (or expected very large output...

The concept of `ComplexInfinity` in Symbolics tries to be in line with Mathematica, where it is defined as "represents a quantity with infinite magnitude, but undetermined complex phase.". In my...

NB: A proper `Limit` module would be great!

For what's worth, this is what Mathematica does for `tan(pi/2)`. But we do not necessarily have to behave the same way as Mathematica: ![2017-08-17 21_45_00- unnamed - wolfram mathematica online](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/47147/29430624-9d1480be-8384-11e7-84fb-129beb66fca1.png)

One difference we currently have to Mathematica is that the latter distinguishes between `Undefined` and `Indeterminate` (e.g. `0/0`, or `Re[ComplexInfinity]`). We do not yet have this distinction in Symbolics. See...

I don't think we have anything simple to use, but agree that we should normalize (on Simplify - **not** automatic simplification). A rule could be that the leading coefficient of...