Ryan

I know what you are talking about and it doesn't change what I said

> How are we supposed to enable debugging as if `ACTIONS_STEP_DEBUG` was `true`? You can't, we are not the same thing as GHA runner, so naturally we don't have same...

I doubt it's impossible to implement but it will need to be tested properly.

Hi, could you please post full log from `act`?

Ok, so issue occurs only on Windows due to copy. I have no idea yet how to fix that. Windows ``` [Master/linter] 🚀 Start image=catthehacker/ubuntu:act-latest [Master/linter] 🐳 docker pull catthehacker/ubuntu:act-latest...

I don't think that there is a need for more logs. Issue occurs during copy between Windows/MacOS Linux. I'll try to investigate that when I will have some free time...

Wouldn't it be better to store proofs on user profile sub? That way you don't have to worry about subreddit management ever. example: https://www.reddit.com/user/CatTheHacker/comments/npaquv/this_is_my_keys_pub_proof/

We could probably put homebrew inside, since they implemented API based package index as opposed to having whole repository cloned

What could be done is to allow packages to define post installation configuration (like `apt` has `debconf`) but I'm strongly against adding option such as enabling features via `winget`.

`container:` is not yet supported (as in, it will run in a container, but you won't get `node` and other stuff that GHA mounts into that container for it to...