Jean Boussier

Indeed, and that's how I'll implement it anyway, but if it's not enforced by the protocol, switching a simple client for a cluster client becomes much more problematic.

And also it makes it easy for proxies to blindly extract the keys without having to know the commands signatures.

> the client that produced the query can know because it must offer to the user a constructor for this hypotetical type Well, that is not the intent @antirez [expressed...

Ouch, totally slipped my mind.

@jimmycuadra tests fixed!

Damn that's a race condition :/. Maybe it's best to forget this. I can monkey patch it from my end.

So the current documentation is: > Returns an array of classes where the receiver is the direct superclass of the class, excluding singleton classes. > The order of the returned...

> I am a bit unsure about this wording I'm not particularly attached to the specific wording, it's more about the overall point. > WDYT about this IMHO, `Class#subclasses` is...

> After line 1, `c` is unusued and the GC could consider the class to be elegible. No, you'd need to exit the current method or block or whatever the...

> One thing is how CRuby works internally today, and a different thing is which is the public contract. It is public contract. APIs such `eval`, `binding.instance_variable_get` etc, implies that...