Ben Lopatin

Not planning on it, but PR's are accepted!

Nothing specifically @morenoh149 - as long as the necessary JS requirements are bundled I'd say go for it.

> Is 2.0.0 only partially ready for use or is there some upgrade step I might have missed? More likely that it is ready but that _I_ missed something with...

Actually I'll walk that back a bit @specialorange: > (I'm happy to show you if you'd like to see them). If you want to share your models here or via...

The short of the issue (or one of the issues) above is that in version 2.0 some of these field names/related names are dynamically named to be relevant to the...

I can think of a couple ways of doing this. One is having both text and HTML body templates. Another is allowing users to override how the email itself is...

> write a new method that returns just the EmailMessage instance This sounds like a good strategy to start.

For context, which organization models are you using? The concrete models? Abstract base models?

That definitely does not sound right. https://github.com/bennylope/django-organizations/blob/c6ead20907ca08e1cceecaf96a109ccddc1187eb/tests/test_utils.py#L22-L38 That function creates the owner right at the end. https://github.com/bennylope/django-organizations/blob/c6ead20907ca08e1cceecaf96a109ccddc1187eb/organizations/utils.py#L109-L112 Before I dig further, could you share how you're calling that function and...

django-organizations doesn't "care" about the authorization system, so it works nicely side by side with social authentication. The invitation component specifically is where you might need to extend this if,...