Bozhidar Batsov

Same here.

Would you be interested in distilling a rule for this now that dust has settled?

That's one interesting point. However, I don't recall ever seeing private macros or multimethods. Maybe we should just extend this a bit, to mention this consideration.

I understand @arrdem's point, but it still makes sense to have shorthands for commonly used stuff (or there should be no shorthands at all for the sake of consistency). I...

@puredanger What about simply deprecating it (`defn-`) and keep it around forever (Java-style)? Seems like a good middle-ground to me. Sends the message this was probably not a good idea...

Two reasons: * reads better (subjectively) * portable across Clojure implementations. All interop calls tie you to the underlying platform.

Yeah, I totally agree this should be formulated in a more generic manner.

@arrdem is completely right. Guess we should add a rule about this.

@MicahElliott Well, both are standard Emacs indentations - the first layout is wider, the second is narrower (and I believe way more common). The second layout has the distinct advantage...

Yes! And sorry about the late response!