Axel Huebl

Will push one more update on the TODOs we marked in the RBC routines - removing reference particle info from it to avoid duplication and collisions.

ping @RTSandberg @n01r for review :)

> The reference particle data is still written to "ref_particle_," but is no longer duplicated in "reduced_beam_characteristics_". Correct. The issue was that it would otherwise collide in names once we...

> I think it's important that we keep the reference particle text output. It is a small cost for I/O, and allows a quick check by the user without any...

Perfect, ok that is what I thought, too. I added the `s` column back to the text file now :)

Hi @koesterf, Thanks for your question! You want to use the `reduced_beam_characteristics.0.0` file, which has a line entry per simulation step. The `_final` named ones only contain the last step....

Hi @koesterf, Sorry for the delay, I had a couple of business trips and was swamped in backlog and an upcoming review. > If you could suggest me one more...

CC @zhangli28 @laxmisubramanyam @tiamiceli @mehdiabedi1234 @electronsandstuff @tanweihou @e-carlin @koesterf @ycaophysics :pray: :tada:

@ChristopherMayes Thank you for your comment. Yes, absolutely. We still finalize a few space charge benchmarks for HB 2023 right now and this is one of them. As stated in...

@ChristopherMayes commented that if we also plot Fig 2 of https://accelconf.web.cern.ch/ipac2018/papers/thpak085.pdf, we can see more precision details (e.g., for fixed precision and infinite number of steps in the MLMG, do...