predicates-rs
predicates-rs copied to clipboard
predicates::path::missing() should handle broken symlinks
The docs for predicates::path::missing() say:
Creates a new Predicate that ensures the path doesn’t exist.
However, if the path is a symlink pointing to nothing, then it will be treated as not existing, when in fact the symlink is a file that exists.
Open to the idea that a broken link should count as not existing, but either way it would be useful for the function's docs to cover this.
It also gets complicated as a symlink may start to exist or not exist based on changes to other parts of the filesystem.
I tried this code:
use predicates::prelude::*;
use std::{fs, os::unix, path::Path};
fn main() {
let _ = fs::remove_file("symlink-to-non-existent-path");
unix::fs::symlink("non-existent-path", "symlink-to-non-existent-path").unwrap();
let predicate_fn = predicate::path::missing();
// Shouldn't be missing as symlink is a real file.
assert_eq!(false, predicate_fn.eval(Path::new("non-existent-file.foo")));
}
I expected the assert to pass, but it failed.
Meta
predicates-rs version: 2.1.0
rustc --version: 1.57.0
I think instead of:
fn eval(&self, path: &path::Path) -> bool {
path.exists() == self.exists
}
fn eval(&self, path: &path::Path) -> bool {
( path.exists() || path.symlink_metadata().is_ok() ) == self.exists
}
Happy to raise a PR for this.
Thanks for creating this issue!
I feel like matching path.exists() will most meet people's expectations and I worry changing it will break someone and would rather not break compatibility.
I can see us exposing an API with more specific checks (is_file, is_dir, is_symlink) and the corresponding predicate struct could have a follow_symlinks(false) function to customize it, like we do with utf8 on other predicates.
The main question is ow to expose this. Some ideas:
is_file,is_dir,is_symlinkfile_type(FileType::File)file_type(FileType::FILE | FileType::DIR).