adding influxdb support complex ?

hi !

i was wondering if it's complex to add support to influxdb ?

any clues about that ?

Can you link to rest API docs? Or a client or something?

Gut instinct is that I think we should do plugin architecture first, but if it's easy...

here is a link to an influxdb python client : https://github.com/influxdb/influxdb-python link to influxdb Api : http://influxdb.com/docs/v0.8/api/reading_and_writing_data.html

i totally agree with the plugin architecture milestone :)

Looks manageable - I don't have an example to test against but I'd be happy to add in if we have some mock responses/tests for same.

+1 this support could be really usefull. You have the online demo there http://play.influxdb.org/

@dbuxton Did you get some time to test it ?

I know that @bonniejools is working on a plugin architecture that will allow us to add support for arbitrary services. Will have an update soon I hope.

+1

+1

+1

+1

@dbuxton do you know know if there is some progress on it ?

It looks like a fork of cabot has added this https://github.com/Affirm/cabot

Maybe we can try and pull some changes back upstream

@frankh Sounds like a plan.

The only question is − should we try moving Cabot checks to a plugin architecture first ?

So, we now have a check plugin architecture :)