maven
maven copied to clipboard
[MNG-7520] Simplify integration of Redisson and Hazelcast for Maven R…
…esolver
This closes #776
Following this checklist to help us incorporate your contribution quickly and easily:
- [ ] Make sure there is a JIRA issue filed for the change (usually before you start working on it). Trivial changes like typos do not require a JIRA issue. Your pull request should address just this issue, without pulling in other changes.
- [ ] Each commit in the pull request should have a meaningful subject line and body.
- [ ] Format the pull request title like
[MNG-XXX] SUMMARY, where you replaceMNG-XXXandSUMMARYwith the appropriate JIRA issue. Best practice is to use the JIRA issue title in the pull request title and in the first line of the commit message. - [ ] Write a pull request description that is detailed enough to understand what the pull request does, how, and why.
- [ ] Run
mvn clean verifyto make sure basic checks pass. A more thorough check will be performed on your pull request automatically. - [ ] You have run the Core IT successfully.
If your pull request is about ~20 lines of code you don't need to sign an Individual Contributor License Agreement if you are unsure please ask on the developers list.
To make clear that you license your contribution under the Apache License Version 2.0, January 2004 you have to acknowledge this by using the following check-box.
-
[ ] I hereby declare this contribution to be licenced under the Apache License Version 2.0, January 2004
-
[ ] In any other case, please file an Apache Individual Contributor License Agreement.
@jebeaudet have a look
Am unsure about the "worthiness" of this PR.... I mean, will someone really want to use Hazelcast AND Redisson? IMHO, this is -0 as am pretty sure people will "stick" to one or another, and also, there is file locking...
Am unsure about the "worthiness" of this PR.... I mean, will someone really want to use Hazelcast AND Redisson? IMHO, this is -0 as am pretty sure people will "stick" to one or another, and also, there is file locking...
It is not about having BOTH in place. It shalls imply reduce manual setup and simplification of our documentation. Both are contained to handle both cases, NOT at the same time. Even for testing with a new Maven version I have to perform these stupid manual tests over and over again.
Note that this does not include any JARs, just the skeleton to make it happen.
@cstamas how should I continue here? This is a reasonable simplification for everyone wants to use either one.
@cstamas Is my reasoning clear on this?