Andreas Varga

OK. So once again my reply to your proposal. The best for SLICOT integration would be of course to have compatibility starting with the LTS version, as well as with...

This was only a wishful thinking of me (not important for further developments).

Sorry for my ignorance, but what follows now? In the meantime, I have troubles even registering under Julia v1.7 (see [#68456](https://github.com/JuliaRegistries/General/issues/68456)).

For Julia 1.7 v3.0.4 of blastrampoline is used, which is OK. For Julia 1.8 and 1.9, version v5.1.0 is used and not the last available version v5.1.1. I wonder if...

I observed that the last call to generate the binaries contains a dependency to julia 1.7. Is this a lower limit on the version or it must be also adapted...

I propose to keep the version of SLICOT as it is now.

Congratulations and many thanks!

This is a similar problem for which I opened an [issue](https://github.com/JuliaRegistries/General/issues/68456) when trying to register a new version of [PeriodicSystems](https://github.com/andreasvarga/PeriodicSystems.jl). This issue has been closed, with the conclusion that >...

I formulated an [issue](https://github.com/andreasvarga/PeriodicSystems.jl/issues/13) regarding the failure of [PeriodicSystems](https://github.com/andreasvarga/PeriodicSystems.jl) release 0.4.2 on Windows with Julia 1.8 (with Julia 1.7 it works, as well as on Linux). I can easily reproduce...

A question: As I remember, with SLICOT_jll for v5.7, I executed all tests with both Julia 1.7 and 1.8 without problems. What is essentially different now with the version for...