cove

cove copied to clipboard

You can see that there are many searches, but only part of it is displayed, and you cannot turn to the next page

Thanks, I'll look in to supporting this.

In the interim, make your search more specific to get the results you want.

In the interim, make your search more specific to get the results you want.

On that note, please add filtering. Even google's syntax to begin with, like "searchterm_1 searchterm_2" for whole string search -searchterm for exclusions

If you can call jackett or Prowlarr services in the background, you don't need to use the built-in search engine, but unfortunately this feature is not supported at this time

If you can call jackett or Prowlarr services in the background, you don't need to use the built-in search engine, but unfortunately this feature is not supported at this time

What do you mean, use them as frontend and Cove as source?

cove acts as a frontend, calling them when searching for data

cove acts as a frontend, calling them when searching for data

What would be the point?

You can just copy the infohashes or magnet links into cove if you use another search source. You should rarely need to use another source if you let cove run for a day or two, it will have a very comprehensive index by that stage.

cove supports streaming, transcoding and casting in addition to the builtin search.

You can just copy the infohashes or magnet links into cove if you use another search source. You should rarely need to use another source if you let cove run for a day or two, it will have a very comprehensive index by that stage.

cove supports streaming, transcoding and casting in addition to the builtin search.

I would just like some listing and search improvements. Also, dark theme would be nice [oled black preferably]. I don't care about its torrent nor transcoding capabilities at all. If you don't plan to open source, you could perhaps provide some search API with normal output [json and the likes]. So we could deal with it on our own.

@anacrolix How would you search currently for Aphex Twin albums [as example] to narrow it down and exclude Twin Peaks series and Twin porn results?

You can just copy the infohashes or magnet links into cove if you use another search source. You should rarely need to use another source if you let cove run for a day or two, it will have a very comprehensive index by that stage. cove supports streaming, transcoding and casting in addition to the builtin search.

I would just like some listing and search improvements. Also, dark theme would be nice [oled black preferably]. I don't care about its torrent nor transcoding capabilities at all. If you don't plan to open source, you could perhaps provide some search API with normal output [json and the likes]. So we could deal with it on our own.

You're just interested in the indexing/searching functionality? Because I do have a separate project that just exposes that but it hasn't been packaged up in a usable form. It does expose an API too.

@anacrolix How would you search currently for Aphex Twin albums [as example] to narrow it down and exclude Twin Peaks series and Twin porn results?

You would just search for aphex twin. Twin peaks and Twin porn would be pushed down as they don't include aphex.

I appreciate the feedback barolo!

You're just interested in the indexing/searching functionality? Because I do have a separate project that just exposes that but it hasn't been packaged up in a usable form. It does expose an API too.

Yeah, I only care about indexing. BTW, do you do any filtering for the index, for illegal content perhaps? I've realized that I need filtering/blacklist because there's still too much trash, and content in languages I don't care about. So I've been exploring alternatives, and most of them have some fors of blacklistig/filtering. To name few there's dhtc; bitmagnet seems promising too.

I don't find the search to return any trash, I think my search works quite well (I dogfood it, so it represents how I use search). See the issue I created for the HTTP API being exposed.

I don't find the search to return any trash, I think my search works quite well (I dogfood it, so it represents how I use search). See the issue I created for the HTTP API being exposed.

Perhaps I've phrased it wrong. It's not about search returning trash (although the results usually will contain some down the list). It's about index containing thrash. Which is why I've asked about your filters.

I understand. They would be trivial to implement. Let's create a new issue for this.

It would be great if you could add the feature so it is possible to see the rest of the search results, thank you :)