spectrum-web-components icon indicating copy to clipboard operation
spectrum-web-components copied to clipboard

refactor(progress-circle): use core tokens

Open pfulton opened this issue 3 years ago โ€ข 5 comments

This updates the ProgressCircle component to use core tokens

Uses beta release. Hold for full release.

Description

Related issue(s)

Motivation and context

How has this been tested?

  • [ ] Test case 1
    1. Go here
    2. Do this
  • [ ] Test case 2
    1. Go here
    2. Do this

Screenshots (if appropriate)

Types of changes

  • [ ] Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • [ ] New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • [ ] Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to change)
  • [ ] Chore (minor updates related to the tooling or maintenance of the repository, does not impact compiled assets)

Checklist

  • [ ] I have signed the Adobe Open Source CLA.
  • [ ] My code follows the code style of this project.
  • [ ] If my change required a change to the documentation, I have updated the documentation in this pull request.
  • [ ] I have read the CONTRIBUTING document.
  • [ ] I have added tests to cover my changes.
  • [ ] All new and existing tests passed.
  • [ ] I have reviewed at the Accessibility Practices for this feature, see: Aria Practices

Best practices

This repository uses conventional commit syntax for each commit message; note that the GitHub UI does not use this by default so be cautious when accepting suggested changes. Avoid the "Update branch" button on the pull request and opt instead for rebasing your branch against main.

pfulton avatar Aug 24 '22 14:08 pfulton

Tachometer results

Chrome

action-bar permalink

Version Bytes Avg Time vs remote vs branch
npm latest 244 kB 51.49ms - 52.61ms - unsure ๐Ÿ”
-1% - +2%
-0.71ms - +1.27ms
branch 244 kB 50.95ms - 52.59ms unsure ๐Ÿ”
-2% - +1%
-1.27ms - +0.71ms
-

action-menu permalink

Version Bytes Avg Time vs remote vs branch
npm latest 608 kB 335.77ms - 341.74ms - unsure ๐Ÿ”
-2% - +1%
-6.61ms - +2.52ms
branch 610 kB 337.34ms - 344.26ms unsure ๐Ÿ”
-1% - +2%
-2.52ms - +6.61ms
-

card permalink

Version Bytes Avg Time vs remote vs branch
npm latest 391 kB 127.04ms - 131.38ms - unsure ๐Ÿ”
-2% - +3%
-2.12ms - +3.90ms
branch 392 kB 126.24ms - 130.41ms unsure ๐Ÿ”
-3% - +2%
-3.90ms - +2.12ms
-

illustrated-message permalink

Version Bytes Avg Time vs remote vs branch
npm latest 293 kB 61.37ms - 62.93ms - unsure ๐Ÿ”
-0% - +3%
-0.11ms - +1.88ms
branch 293 kB 60.66ms - 61.89ms unsure ๐Ÿ”
-3% - +0%
-1.88ms - +0.11ms
-

menu permalink

Version Bytes Avg Time vs remote vs branch
npm latest 309 kB 385.22ms - 392.99ms - unsure ๐Ÿ”
-2% - +1%
-6.48ms - +3.63ms
branch 311 kB 387.29ms - 393.76ms unsure ๐Ÿ”
-1% - +2%
-3.63ms - +6.48ms
-

overlay permalink

Version Bytes Avg Time vs remote vs branch
npm latest 347 kB 110.19ms - 113.81ms - unsure ๐Ÿ”
-3% - +2%
-3.36ms - +1.94ms
branch 348 kB 110.78ms - 114.64ms unsure ๐Ÿ”
-2% - +3%
-1.94ms - +3.36ms
-

picker permalink

Version Bytes Avg Time vs remote vs branch
npm latest 454 kB 1200.55ms - 1216.07ms - faster โœ”
0% - 2%
0.64ms - 28.18ms
branch 454 kB 1211.35ms - 1234.10ms slower โŒ
0% - 2%
0.64ms - 28.18ms
-

popover permalink

Version Bytes Avg Time vs remote vs branch
npm latest 241 kB 43.75ms - 44.80ms - unsure ๐Ÿ”
-2% - +2%
-1.10ms - +0.70ms
branch 241 kB 43.75ms - 45.21ms unsure ๐Ÿ”
-2% - +2%
-0.70ms - +1.10ms
-

progress-circle permalink

Version Bytes Avg Time vs remote vs branch
npm latest 258 kB 89.57ms - 92.21ms - unsure ๐Ÿ”
-3% - +1%
-2.87ms - +1.08ms
branch 258 kB 90.32ms - 93.25ms unsure ๐Ÿ”
-1% - +3%
-1.08ms - +2.87ms
-

slider permalink

Version Bytes Avg Time vs remote vs branch
npm latest 341 kB 211.97ms - 216.27ms - faster โœ”
0% - 3%
0.86ms - 7.46ms
branch 340 kB 215.78ms - 220.78ms slower โŒ
0% - 3%
0.86ms - 7.46ms
-

split-button permalink

Version Bytes Avg Time vs remote vs branch
npm latest 546 kB 2044.15ms - 2048.35ms - unsure ๐Ÿ”
-0% - +0%
-1.31ms - +4.21ms
branch 547 kB 2043.01ms - 2046.60ms unsure ๐Ÿ”
-0% - +0%
-4.21ms - +1.31ms
-

tooltip permalink

Version Bytes Avg Time vs remote vs branch
npm latest 247 kB 46.13ms - 47.48ms - unsure ๐Ÿ”
-3% - +2%
-1.60ms - +0.72ms
branch 247 kB 46.31ms - 48.19ms unsure ๐Ÿ”
-2% - +3%
-0.72ms - +1.60ms
-
Firefox

action-bar permalink

Version Bytes Avg Time vs remote vs branch
npm latest 244 kB 128.26ms - 146.46ms - unsure ๐Ÿ”
-10% - +7%
-13.97ms - +9.85ms
branch 244 kB 131.74ms - 147.10ms unsure ๐Ÿ”
-7% - +10%
-9.85ms - +13.97ms
-

action-menu permalink

Version Bytes Avg Time vs remote vs branch
npm latest 608 kB 491.75ms - 505.01ms - unsure ๐Ÿ”
-3% - +1%
-12.65ms - +6.93ms
branch 610 kB 494.03ms - 508.45ms unsure ๐Ÿ”
-1% - +3%
-6.93ms - +12.65ms
-

card permalink

Version Bytes Avg Time vs remote vs branch
npm latest 391 kB 218.86ms - 229.66ms - unsure ๐Ÿ”
-2% - +5%
-5.09ms - +10.25ms
branch 392 kB 216.24ms - 227.12ms unsure ๐Ÿ”
-5% - +2%
-10.25ms - +5.09ms
-

illustrated-message permalink

Version Bytes Avg Time vs remote vs branch
npm latest 293 kB 116.80ms - 132.56ms - unsure ๐Ÿ”
-6% - +11%
-7.83ms - +12.91ms
branch 293 kB 115.40ms - 128.88ms unsure ๐Ÿ”
-10% - +6%
-12.91ms - +7.83ms
-

menu permalink

Version Bytes Avg Time vs remote vs branch
npm latest 309 kB 635.52ms - 649.04ms - unsure ๐Ÿ”
-1% - +2%
-5.20ms - +13.80ms
branch 311 kB 631.31ms - 644.65ms unsure ๐Ÿ”
-2% - +1%
-13.80ms - +5.20ms
-

overlay permalink

Version Bytes Avg Time vs remote vs branch
npm latest 347 kB 221.69ms - 234.79ms - unsure ๐Ÿ”
-6% - +2%
-15.09ms - +4.41ms
branch 348 kB 226.36ms - 240.80ms unsure ๐Ÿ”
-2% - +7%
-4.41ms - +15.09ms
-

picker permalink

Version Bytes Avg Time vs remote vs branch
npm latest 454 kB 1368.69ms - 1392.87ms - unsure ๐Ÿ”
-1% - +1%
-15.68ms - +13.96ms
branch 454 kB 1373.06ms - 1390.22ms unsure ๐Ÿ”
-1% - +1%
-13.96ms - +15.68ms
-

popover permalink

Version Bytes Avg Time vs remote vs branch
npm latest 241 kB 121.83ms - 144.01ms - unsure ๐Ÿ”
-10% - +14%
-12.64ms - +18.24ms
branch 241 kB 119.38ms - 140.86ms unsure ๐Ÿ”
-14% - +9%
-18.24ms - +12.64ms
-

progress-circle permalink

Version Bytes Avg Time vs remote vs branch
npm latest 258 kB 261.80ms - 276.64ms - faster โœ”
1% - 8%
2.20ms - 22.80ms
branch 258 kB 274.57ms - 288.87ms slower โŒ
1% - 9%
2.20ms - 22.80ms
-

slider permalink

Version Bytes Avg Time vs remote vs branch
npm latest 341 kB 403.29ms - 416.27ms - unsure ๐Ÿ”
-1% - +3%
-4.18ms - +13.34ms
branch 340 kB 399.31ms - 411.09ms unsure ๐Ÿ”
-3% - +1%
-13.34ms - +4.18ms
-

split-button permalink

Version Bytes Avg Time vs remote vs branch
npm latest 546 kB 2201.95ms - 2225.65ms - unsure ๐Ÿ”
-1% - +1%
-23.51ms - +11.59ms
branch 547 kB 2206.81ms - 2232.71ms unsure ๐Ÿ”
-1% - +1%
-11.59ms - +23.51ms
-

tooltip permalink

Version Bytes Avg Time vs remote vs branch
npm latest 247 kB 110.58ms - 128.02ms - unsure ๐Ÿ”
-3% - +17%
-3.31ms - +18.75ms
branch 247 kB 104.84ms - 118.32ms unsure ๐Ÿ”
-15% - +2%
-18.75ms - +3.31ms
-

github-actions[bot] avatar Aug 24 '22 14:08 github-actions[bot]

@lunarfusion Mind taking a look at this one?

pfulton avatar Aug 25 '22 21:08 pfulton

Summary of Changes Impacting Failures

The blue of the progress circle changed in dark and darkest themes. Here is a visual swatch reference (from left to right, swatches are spectrum dark, spectrum darkest, and spectrum light/lightest):

spectrum progress circle color swatches

Track thickness has changed on large progress circles, medium theme, from 5px to 4px. This does not appear to be impacting the failures.

The gray track color is unchanged.


The following are my assessments of the failures.

Failure pattern 1: Expected

classic-dark-large-ltrย โ€” classic-dark-large-rtlย โ€” express-dark-large-ltrย โ€” express-dark-large-rtlย โ€” classic-dark-medium-ltrย โ€” classic-dark-medium-rtlย โ€” express-dark-medium-ltrย โ€” express-dark-medium-rtlย โ€”

Assessment: Failures expected due to blue color shift from rgb(84, 163, 246) to rgb(114, 183, 249) Visual diff confirms (similar visual for all 8 failures).

dark-diff

Failure pattern 2: Expected

classic-darkest-large-ltrย โ€” classic-darkest-large-rtlย โ€” express-darkest-large-ltrย โ€” express-darkest-large-rtlย โ€” classic-darkest-medium-ltrย โ€” classic-darkest-medium-rtlย โ€” express-darkest-medium-ltrย โ€” express-darkest-medium-rtlย โ€”

Assessment: Failures expected due to blue color shift from rgb(64, 150, 243) to rgb(94, 170, 247) Visual diff confirms (similar visual for all 8 failures).

darkest-diff

Failure pattern 3: Unexpected

classic-light-medium-ltrย โ€” classic-light-medium-rtlย โ€” express-light-medium-ltrย โ€” express-light-medium-rtlย โ€” classic-light-large-ltrย โ€” classic-light-large-rtlย โ€” express-light-large-ltrย โ€” express-light-large-rtlย โ€” express-lightest-medium-ltrย โ€” express-lightest-medium-rtlย โ€” express-lightest-large-ltrย โ€” express-lightest-large-rtlย โ€”

Assessment: Unexpected results.

  • This appears to be comparing the "Over Background" variant at https://opensource.adobe.com/spectrum-css/progresscircle.html with the default/standard appearance of progress circle. Should this be compared instead with the new "Static White" variant? If so, I'm not sure why this failure is only showing up on the light/lightest themes.
  • If this test is meant to compare "Over Background" and "Static White", then the test will still fail due to a change in transparency from 20% opacity to 25% opacity.

These visuals appear consistent for all 12 of these failures.

Screen Shot 2022-09-02 at 3 22 39 PM

Screen Shot 2022-09-02 at 3 22 54 PM

Failure pattern 4: Unexpected

classic-lightest-large-ltrย โ€” classic-lightest-large-rtlย โ€” classic-lightest-medium-ltrย โ€” classic-lightest-medium-rtlย โ€”

Assessment: Failures NOT expected. Diff cannot be seen in the visuals - colors appear the same to me. The diff shows a stark difference, however. Not sure how to address this - please advise? Visual for reference:

classic-lightest-large

classic-lightest-large-diff

Failure pattern 5: Expected, needs approval (Approved)

hcm-visualย โ€”

Failure expected, but please review this diff to make sure. Previously, the progress bar could not be read because the track and the fill were the same color. Visual:

Screen Shot 2022-09-02 at 2 11 02 PM

I changed the fill to a contrasting keyword so it can be seen:

Screen Shot 2022-09-02 at 2 11 11 PM

Update: James Nurthen recommended a change to WHCM which has been made and approved. The new VRT reflects this change: Screen Shot 2022-10-04 at 2 05 59 PM

lunarfusion avatar Sep 02 '22 20:09 lunarfusion

@pfulton To complete this PR, may I please follow up on these issues described in my previous comment above?

Failure pattern 3: Unexpected Question: Is it safe to assume this failure is expected because it is comparing apples to oranges?

Failure pattern 4: Unexpected Question: Is it safe to assume this is a false failure?

Failure pattern 5: Expected, needs approval Question: Is my change to WHCM acceptable?

Thank you!

lunarfusion avatar Sep 13 '22 19:09 lunarfusion

@pfulton To complete this PR, may I please follow up on these issues described in my previous comment above?

Failure pattern 3: Unexpected Question: Is it safe to assume this failure is expected because it is comparing apples to oranges?

Failure pattern 4: Unexpected Question: Is it safe to assume this is a false failure?

Failure pattern 5: Expected, needs approval Question: Is my change to WHCM acceptable?

Thank you!

  • Failure pattern 3: Yeah, I think it's safe to assume that.
  • Failure pattern 4: It looks like it might be a false failure - I wonder what happened on this one. Maybe @Westbrook can advise.
  • Failure pattern 5: I think this looks OK to me. As to whether this is an acceptable a11y change: I'm definitely not the best judge there. We could ask accessibility in your original CSS PR to weigh in, though. I'll follow-up with you in Slack about this.

I think this is really close. I'll rebase this branch against the latest stuff in main and push up the changes.

pfulton avatar Sep 29 '22 20:09 pfulton

Failure Pattern 5 (WHCM) was reviewed with James Nurthen and a revision was made to match his recommendation.

lunarfusion avatar Oct 04 '22 18:10 lunarfusion

I've updated this to use the graduated version of the dependency. This is now ready for a full review.

pfulton avatar Oct 04 '22 20:10 pfulton

Ship it!

Westbrook avatar Oct 19 '22 16:10 Westbrook