TylerBrock

Yeah that would be useful. I'm definitely into it.

This is great! Apologizes, I've been busy and haven't gotten a chance to look at this yet. I'll try and review the code soon. Thanks for contributing.

Hey, sorry for the delay getting back to you here. You can definitely apply a filter to the tail using the `--filter` flag. You can check out the [filter and...

Nice catch, want to attempt to fix it?

Yeah, that would be awesome. Thanks for the idea.

Do you want to take a stab at this and issue a pull request?

hey @soleo, go for it

@fmaylinch that looks interesting, kind of dangerous though with multi on! I don't think this is general enough to apply to a lot of use cases. Perhaps with multi off...

You are correct the find().update() chain is also multi by default (so that it behaves more like sql). Want to put up a pull request for the change?

OK good idea. Maybe only if it is slower than slowms. However I do like seeing which index was used as it may yield some surprises.