checkhelper

checkhelper copied to clipboard

roxygen2 now uses messages instead of warnings so the tests fail. I would have attempted a fix, but I don't understand how your package code is generated.

Running ‘testthat.R’
Running the tests in ‘tests/testthat.R’ failed.
Complete output:
> library(testthat)
> library(checkhelper)
> 
> test_check("checkhelper")
Package: checkpackage
Title: What the Package Does (One Line, Title Case)
Version: 0.0.0.9000
...
    ▆
 1. ├─usethis::with_project(...) at test-find_missing_values.R:68:3
 2. │ └─base::force(code)
 3. └─testthat::expect_warning(attachment::att_amend_desc(), regexp = "@return") at test-find_missing_values.R:113:5
── Failure ('test-find_missing_values.R:120:5'): find_missing_tags works ───────
`out <- expect_message(find_missing_tags(path), "my_long_fun_name_for_multiple_lines_globals")` did not produce any warnings.

[ FAIL 3 | WARN 0 | SKIP 0 | PASS 67 ]
Error: Test failures
Execution halted

Validation

• [ ] tests pass with a version lower than 7.3.0

• [ ] tests pass with a version higher than 7.3.0

Since I can't provide a fix and it's a busy time of the year, I'll push submission back to Jan 15. But please let me know if you can fix earlier or its ok to break on CRAN.

Thanks for the warning.
That's ok if it fails on CRAN. We plan to provide a fix by the end of January.

Note that I understand how it can be confusing to mix development with {fusen} if you never used it before. However, you can always provide a fix the way you use to do in a classical package. The maintainer can then decide to re-generate it or not. The package structure keeps being a classical package structure. I'll try to make it clearer for future external contributions.