readlex
readlex copied to clipboard
"incline" spelled wrong
I looked up the sequence "๐ฏ๐" on the online dictionary and noticed that forms of "incline" showed up when it should not have (and spelled with "๐๐" because it's not a morpheme boundary).
Can you expand on what you mean? I checked 'incline' and all its related forms and they seem to be spelled with ๐ฏ๐, which is correct according to my reference dictionaries.
Thanks. All the in- prefixes are spelled ๐ฆ๐ฏ-, or should be. That's pretty standard RP, and is also reflected in RP pronunciation as recorded in my reference dictionaries.
Shavian spelling should change if pronunciation changes. The thing is, this word can be pronounced with /n/ rather than having it assimilated to /ล/. For words coming from Latin in- + k, dictionaries give either or both pronunciations in various order, differing on a case-by-case basis. This one is more often transcribed with /n/ only or with /n/ preferred over /ล/. Maybe it has something to do with stress, or maybe not. I'm not aware of a simple rule to determine it. You will find few more words like that.
I noticed similar โproblemโ three years ago with increment being spelled ๐ฆ๐ฏ๐๐ฎ๐ฉ๐ฅ๐ฉ๐ฏ๐ in ReadLex instead of ๐ฆ๐๐๐ฎ๐ฉ๐ฅ๐ฉ๐ฏ๐ which I would prefer. The situation is similar, except that much more sources prefer /ล/ over /n/ for increment. But not Cambridge which gives /n/ first in both cases. We should probably tolerate both spellings, and perhaps ReadLex could keep track of them like it (inconsistently) does with some other spellings based on variant pronunciations. The current spelling, however, follows ReadLex's rules correctly, so there is nothing to fix.
I say /ษชn/ which is not itself conclusive or persuasive, but at least shows the dictionaries aren't just giving the /ษชn/ pronunciation due to some archaic convention.
I say /ษชn/ which is not itself conclusive or persuasive, but at least shows the dictionaries aren't just giving the /ษชn/ pronunciation due to some archaic convention.
I'm failing to find any online sources that show it pronounced with ๐ฆ๐ (Cambridge, Oxford, Merriam-Webster, Collins, Longman, dictionary.com, etc). It is subtle, but I too think of it as "๐ฆ๐ฏ" rather than "๐ฆ๐".
๐ฒ๐ฅ ๐๐๐จ๐ฏ๐๐ฆ๐ ๐ช๐ฏ ๐จ๐ฏ ๐ฆ๐ฏ๐๐ค๐ฒ๐ฏ.
vs
๐ฒ๐ฅ ๐๐๐จ๐ฏ๐๐ฆ๐ ๐ช๐ฏ ๐จ๐ฏ ๐ฆ๐๐ ๐ค๐ฒ๐ฏ.