Safa Alfulaij

Results 18 comments of Safa Alfulaij

I'm wondering do we also need to use the new “3 dots character thing” (…) instead of three dots (...)?

I was just wondering, nothing else :rofl: Same goes for curved quotes (“” and ‘’ instead of "" and '')

I intentionally chose to have an Arabic name on Pontoon to trigger these bugs, alongside with using my lovely native language :) The easy solution is to wrap mentions in...

@mathjazz Hmmm, Your proposal is effectively the same idea. I believe it let's the browser handle the direction without explicitly saying that. So yes, it can be used! And regarding...

علل في كلمات أخرى ![الخَوّانة](https://cloud.githubusercontent.com/assets/3509617/10225977/d6b1f36c-686d-11e5-88c5-e9fea2587397.png) ![الجَأْش](https://cloud.githubusercontent.com/assets/3509617/10225978/d6b84424-686d-11e5-9933-8134a8f078d3.png)

وأخرى (النسخة القرآنية بها نفس العلل أيضا) ![screenshot_ _](https://cloud.githubusercontent.com/assets/3509617/11295116/154d07c8-8f7a-11e5-9965-d5e8cac6b678.png) ![screenshot_ _](https://cloud.githubusercontent.com/assets/3509617/11295117/155254e4-8f7a-11e5-9db0-2bf7b20fe689.png) ![screenshot_ _](https://cloud.githubusercontent.com/assets/3509617/11295118/1553c626-8f7a-11e5-8adc-d44b9f257423.png) ![screenshot_ _](https://cloud.githubusercontent.com/assets/3509617/11295119/1559bfb8-8f7a-11e5-959e-a53236eb0206.png) ![screenshot_ _](https://cloud.githubusercontent.com/assets/3509617/11295126/1616cb8a-8f7a-11e5-8fc0-1dfff38c6cf8.png) ![screenshot_ _](https://cloud.githubusercontent.com/assets/3509617/11295124/15ac3fe0-8f7a-11e5-83c8-51e4e7b0af33.png) ![screenshot_ _](https://cloud.githubusercontent.com/assets/3509617/11295121/159b6274-8f7a-11e5-9afe-f6ec697117b4.png) ![screenshot_ _](https://cloud.githubusercontent.com/assets/3509617/11295122/15a60710-8f7a-11e5-90f7-597aca766e52.png) ![screenshot_ _](https://cloud.githubusercontent.com/assets/3509617/11295123/15a898e0-8f7a-11e5-9fba-bf469a794901.png) ![screenshot_ _](https://cloud.githubusercontent.com/assets/3509617/11295125/15ae6d42-8f7a-11e5-98c1-8ab82953ee51.png)

This is what currently stops me from moving to V6. Moving the validation logic to components is not suitable IMOH, and waste resources. I would suggest that instead of providing...

While we are at this, what do you think if we allowed serializers themselves to define what kind of type they are, via a function? This would overwrite the attribute...

I'm also thinking if we make `included_serializers` and `included_resources` the same way. This also would help polymorphic relations, generic relations and custom non-ORM relations and serializers.

Maybe you should try checking the latest version, or check that normal users don't have the ability to review suggestions (from the Permissions tab).