prb-math Investigate whether it's worth it to use ">" instead of ">="

Investigate whether it's worth it to use ">" instead of ">="

Open PaulRBerg opened this issue 3 years ago • 1 comments

As @nonergodic has explained in this comment, it might be more gas efficient to replace all the >= CONSTANT statements with > CONSTANT-1.

My only reservation is that this might not longer be relevant if I use intermediate representation to compile the contracts. That is, >= should be as gas efficient as >.

Jul 03 '22 11:07 PaulRBerg

Related, see these tweets:

Is there a reason not to use "--via-ir"
Pascal's annotations

Sep 30 '22 18:09 PaulRBerg

prb-math prb-math copied to clipboard

Investigate whether it's worth it to use ">" instead of ">="

prb-math
prb-math copied to clipboard