Orie Steele

I'd like to deprecate `holder`, and NOT define it normatively, instead, I would like to define only terms that have some security characteristic associated with the securing format (vp-jwt, vp-data-integrity)....

Relevant sections of the JSON-LD TR: - https://www.w3.org/TR/json-ld11/ > implicitly named graph A [named graph](https://www.w3.org/TR/rdf11-concepts/#dfn-named-graph) created from the value of a [map entry](https://infra.spec.whatwg.org/#map-entry) having an [expanded term definition](https://www.w3.org/TR/json-ld11/#dfn-expanded-term-definition) where `@container`...

Here is the example: https://v.jsld.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

@msporny thanks, I figured that is what was happening. - uri: bnode://genid-95f535e97a5e46e58b107eb7ce611f1c-b1 - uri: bnode://genid-95f535e97a5e46e58b107eb7ce611f1c-b6 ^ these are the URIs that neo4j assigns to the blank nodes (based on a...

^ exactly, I suspect that with an updated graph config in neo4j the link would be imported as `_:c14n0` -> `_:c14n1`, but its not clear what the edge should be......

AFAIK, the "Data Integrity Proofs" or what used to be called "Linked Data Proofs" have not changed in this regard since 2017... Here is an example where I tested them...

Seems related: https://github.com/search?q=org%3Aneo4j-labs+bnode%3A%2F%2F&type=code

A simpler one liner to reproduce the issue (beware it deletes everything, so don't run this outside of a new database): ``` MATCH (n) DETACH DELETE n; DROP CONSTRAINT ON...

Here is a snippet of CQL that adds a link relationship between the proof node and "similar blank nodes"... This is an incredibly expensive hacky work around: ```cql MATCH (n0:...

@VladimirAlexiev I had the same issue with JSON-LD v1.1 before... Its a major reason to convert from the standard JSON representation of a credential to the n-quad or framed versions......