ManuInDenWolken

My bad. Nevertheless, it's still a commonly used library. Since it's used on the entire Java platform, it should be added in my opinion. This list represents a useful piece...

> My bad. Nevertheless, it's still a commonly used library. Since it's used on the entire Java platform, it should be added in my opinion. This list represents a useful...

And I won't. I understand your reasoning, but also see the practical aspects. I argue without consideration of other "awesome" libraries, and weigh what's the best practical option for people...

See https://github.com/akullpp/awesome-java/pull/992#issuecomment-1195180437

It's a dialect. Based on Java. And *for* Java.

You have to differ between a dialect and a completely new language. A dialect builds only upon it's base and ensures inevitably interoperability. In this case, it would be only...

@akullpp Forgot to assign the issue. Please also take a look at the bunch of new pull request.

I have to correct my explaination. The given tools are parser-generators, thus they do only generate parsers which are parts of compilers. The parser does process and transform the input...

With the following section from Wikipedia I'm not agreeing. > The most common type of compiler-compiler is more precisely called a parser generator. It only handles syntactic analysis. It contradicts...