InferOpt.jl icon indicating copy to clipboard operation
InferOpt.jl copied to clipboard

Combinatorial optimization layers for machine learning pipelines

Results 31 InferOpt.jl issues
Sort by recently updated
recently updated
newest added

We should be able to provide keywords arguments as input of the `SPOPlusLoss`, in a similar way as for the `FenchelYoungLoss`. Also needs to be implemented for `SSVMLoss`.

enhancement

It would be nice to be compatible with Julia's Long Term Support (LTS) version 1.6. I think the main obstacle at the moment is the use of the destructuring syntax...

enhancement
good first issue

Currently, `InferOpt` fully supports predictors of the form $\arg\max_y \theta^\top y$ in combinatorial layers. It would be interesting to allow the more general form $$\arg\max_y \theta^\top g(y) + h(y)$$ For...

enhancement

At the moment, InferOpt uses ChainRulesCore for rrules, but it would be nice to be compatible with ForwardDiff dual numbers

enhancement

Show an example in the docs that uses eg. LBFGS instead of SGD

documentation

Add an option to created parallelized version of `PerturbedAdditive` and `PerturbedMultiplicative`, as a keyword argument `is_parallel` in their respective constructors. See #29.

enhancement

Julia 1.8 is no longer a pre-release

See #25. - [x] `PerturbedAdditive` - [x] `PerturbedMultiplicative` - [ ] `SPOPLusLoss` - [ ] `StructuredSVM` - [ ] `RegularizedGeneric` - [ ] More tests

enhancement

It would be interesting to be able to run perturbed maximizers in parallel, especially when `nb_samples` is high or/and the combinatorial algorithm has a long runtime. One option would be...

enhancement